Brewery Law ❘ A Beer Law Blog from a Beer Lawyer

Legal commentary on alcoholic beverage law

Don’t Blame Pliny: Out of State Brewers Have Big Issues With Washington Distribution Laws

Posted on | January 7, 2013 by | 1 Comment

True.

True.

By now, many of you Washingtonians have probably cried your last tears into your Pliny bottle. That’s right, Pliny and the rest of the Russian River gang have bid ado to the Washington market.

The reason for the departure was put forth in a short letter, well-written by Russian River Matriarch, Natalie Cilurzo. The letter is attached as the image to this post; it’s words are true though a bit cryptic. I have personally visited the Russian River brewpub in Santa Rosa, California. It is a mad house – and it is also a cash cow. The Cilurzos are doing the smart thing for their business by ensuring that their brewpub (where they see the highest profit margin) is fueled with ample beer for the maddening crowds of beer-obsessed fans. The brewery taproom is a vital component of brewery success and Russian River has stated that 50% of their revenue is sourced there.

Russian River is investor-driven (20 deep) and cannot ignore the most profitable component of its business. So finding a way to infuse it with more beer is a no brainer. Some beer channel had to be sacrificed. So how do they pick which one?

Is it the least successful one? Is it the most costly one? Is it the newest one? Not really. Is it the one that most burdens their brand’s development? Yep. Washington was sacrificed not because of a bad distributer; not because of a poor consumer base; not because of underperforming sales. Washington was sacrificed because its distribution rules do not allow Russian River to be certain that its beer gets to the outlets that it chooses.

Washington state law mandates all beer distributors to sell beer to retailers who request it. That means everyone from your local mom and pop shop, all the way up to the new to market superpower – BevMo. The more shelf volume you have – and the bigger your coffers – the more beer you can request and buy. How often can those requests come in from a BevMo? Every day.  How about mom and pop? Maybe every week, more like month. Before you know it, the distributor has had to sell its entire stock. No more Pliny.

Russian River is not the first out of state beer manufacturer to say “no thanks” to Washington laws. Big guys like Speakeasy and Allagash had to make similar decisions. In other states, they can control who gets their beer. In other states, its not just self-distributed brewers (like most of Washington’s small brewers) that get to pick and choose to whom they want to sell a beer. So why not focus on those other markets?  Can you blame them?

Some might say that distributors have always allocated beer to specific vendors. Very true – not always legal. What matters is whether or not a retailer is being turned down and whether that retailer decides to contact the LCB about it. The bigger the box, the bigger the chance that will become the result.

The Cilurzos are some of craft brewing’s greatest assets. Vinny emails homebrewers his very own recipes and answers just about any question that is tossed his way via email. That’s a good man. But they also run a business. Sometimes the laws make it easy to make those difficult business decisions. Washington just made itself the better cutting candidate.

 

 

 

Comments

One Response to “Don’t Blame Pliny: Out of State Brewers Have Big Issues With Washington Distribution Laws”

  1. Colorado Beer Laws
    April 21st, 2013 @ 6:04 pm

    [...] revenue,” according to the Washington State Liquor Control Board. Plus stifling legislation in Washington requires all beer to be distributed to any retailer who wants it, leaving both local and out-of-state brewers without a say in where their beverages [...]

Leave a Reply





  •   Subscribe To Our Feed Subscribe To Our RSS Feed To Read Brewery Law!